At inVibe, we’ve been working with AI since our founding in 2013, and we were among the first market research agencies to adopt 

large language models (LLMs) back in 2021

, and we released our LLM tools to clients in 2023. AI isn’t a gimmick or a buzzword for us, it’s central to 

: To develop technology that provides cost-effective, high-speed healthcare market research while maintaining the highest quality.

As AI takes a center stage in healthcare with the release of popular LLMs like ChatGPT and Claude, we’ve continued to integrate the latest AI models, features, and functionality into more of the work we do at inVibe. Working with AI every day, we quickly started to see the cracks and have prioritized finding ways to ensure the accuracy and integrity of AI-generated content.

To ensure our clients have reliable AI insights, we designed and implemented an evaluation system to validate our AI tools. Our language experts and prompt engineers leverage this system to iteratively test the quality and reliability of the outputs. By testing different prompts and LLMs in this system, we’re able to ensure that our AI tools meet our clients’ needs and our high standards.

Practically speaking, we do this by having two trained language experts compare two outputs presented next to one another on one screen. Once we review the two outputs, we score each across 6 categories that are based on best practices for evaluating the quality of language data and conversational LLMs.

: To what extent does the output address everything it was asked to?

: How closely does the output align with our understanding of the voice data? (Rating: 1-4)

: How clear is the relationship between the findings and the verbatim evidence in the output? (Rating: 1-4)

: To what extent is the output presently coherently and in the prescribed way? (Rating: 1-4)

: Does the output include consistent formatting that enhances readability? (Rating: 1-2)

: Are findings in the output supported by citations in the prescribed format? (Rating: 1-2)

Let’s take a look at one of these comparisons in action. In the below image, we’re seeing a quality test of two different LLMs that were prompted to report the key findings from the same set of voice data. After reviewing both outputs, the language expert scrolls down to where they assign scores to each output and select a ‘winner.’

Once we have a significant number of ratings for what we’re assessing, we compare the total scores, sub-scores, and selected winners to determine an overall winner (i.e., the model that performed better). This overall winner becomes our new baseline for this task in the next round of testing and becomes the default way that our AI tools perform this operation in our dashboard—until the next upgrade at least.

Through many iterations of this testing, we’ve improved the quality of our models by 46.73% over the last 12 months (and we expect to continue this pace in the next 12 months)! This means that our clients can rest assured that our AI tools will remain best-in-class: offering comprehensive, accurate, transparent, and comprehensible outputs tuned to market research best practices for qualitative voice data.

Are you interested in learning more about how our AI tools can make your qualitative research simpler, more systematic, and more scalable? 

Pioneer in AI-powered healthcare research since 2013: See how inVibe validates enterprise LLMs with a rigorous testing framework that's improved insights quality by 46.73%. Discover our proven approach to reliable, scalable market research.

Responsible AI: Validating LLM Outputs

Good insights require good research, and good research requires high-quality data. At inVibe, this data comes from pre-designed voice response questions, which we use to elicit the depth of response of traditional qual research without the scheduling and moderation needs of an interview. The resulting voices can provide powerful insights into HCPs and patient behaviors.

However, our methodology demands particular care in how we ask questions – in an unmoderated survey, we need to make sure that we are prompting respondents in a way that elicits useful content while reducing the need to follow up. To accomplish this, we must strike a delicate balance between an open-ended design philosophy and goal-oriented lines of questioning.

Without the back-and-forth of an interview, it can be difficult to imagine respondents speaking both broadly and deeply enough to provide meaningful qualitative insights. Indeed, from the participant’s perspective, our voice response surveys may seem more like quick quant surveys, at least in terms of how long it takes. But getting expansive responses in this format is easier than you may think, mainly for one simple reason: 

When we reach out to stakeholders, whether they are doctors or patients, they are – in one way or another – an expert in some condition. Whether a patient is discussing their experience with an illness, or an HCP is describing their typical patient, our prompts place the respondent in the role of a teacher, an expert. By giving them that role, we empower respondents to speak with authority and confidence on whatever subject we’re trying to dig into.

This positioning sets us up for success and helps us avoid the dreaded “yes/no” quant-esque responses that come from reticent respondents or under-designed write-in surveys. When respondents feel engaged and confident, they will give us more than that.

So, what does this look like? Frequent readers (or partners) may have seen some examples of our voice-response questions in the past, but here is a good example of a prompt that gets someone talking:

“How would you describe what living with multiple sclerosis is like to someone who is unfamiliar with it? What frustrations or challenges do you experience?

The purpose of a question like this is clear: Elicit a patient description of the MS experience. Something that could be asked briefly and answered even more briefly – indeed, a perfectly valid line of inquiry would be to ask for a few adjectives. But by putting a patient directly into the role of an explainer, we set an implicit expectation. We want a story, not just a description. And by tapping into how MS makes patients feel, we can get just that:

Question 1, Response 34

We set the stage for this respondent, and she took it. By harnessing people’s desire to be the expert, we can get the rich voice data that our insights are made of.

Now that we see the benefit of getting a respondent talking, why not take it further, go broader? If we just need more voice to get the insights, why not just design for maximum response length?

First and perhaps most obviously, we need to respect our experts’ time. 

, and trying to push through it in an unmoderated environment can lead to lopsided or outright bad data.

But second, and equally important, is that designing around the fundamental research questions makes responses more coherent and insights more accessible. One standard part of our survey design process is making sure each prompt we write corresponds to a research question or goal our client has. If our client wants to know a patient’s thoughts on new treatments, we do not use half of the survey breaking down symptom impact. One prompt that gets us context on disease experience can be extremely helpful in interpreting a patient’s later eagerness or hesitation to try something new, but we build the prompt to that specific purpose.

There is a third ‘why-not’ that is more situational but often quite powerful: setting boundaries gives respondents the chance to meaningfully break them. Compare the following examples:

A.  What is your overall experience with Treatment X?

B.  How effective has Treatment X been at managing your condition?

If a patient focuses on side effects when answering A., we can infer that side effects are the most top-of-mind aspect of Treatment X. Efficacy goes un-discussed, which tells us something about the patient’s priorities.

If a patient focuses on side effects when answering B., however, that tells us a little more. Not only are side effects top-of-mind, but we’re seeing the respondent choose to focus on that aspect of treatment X at the expense of efficacy. This signals both the patient’s priorities (which we would have gotten from A) and that whatever efficacy X has is not enough to justify those side effects. We get more insight by providing a little more guidance, even if our respondent disregards it.

This strategy is an example of how we take the linguistic expertise we use when analyzing responses and put it to work on the design side. Awareness of language helps us not only find insights in the data, but elicit the kind of data that will give us plenty to fins.

There is always more to be said about survey design, but the best way to understand how we put these principles into action is through an example. If you want to see how we would handle your research questions, 

Learn how inVibe crafts effective voice response questions for healthcare research. Discover techniques for balancing open-ended prompts with goal-oriented design to elicit meaningful patient and HCP insights.

How we ask: How inVibe writes voice response questions

Crohn's & Colitis Awareness Week takes place annually from December 1-7 to raise awareness about inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Since 2011, this week has aimed to educate the public about two conditions that affect millions of Americans, Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

In this post, we’ll be focusing on ulcerative colitis (UC). UC colitis is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease that causes inflammation and ulcers in the large intestine, or colon. Symptoms typically include persistent diarrhea, abdominal pain, rectal bleeding, fever, and weight loss, though the severity can vary among individuals.

Symptoms of UC and flare ups often seem unpredictable, and those living with the condition often exert some semblance of control via strict adherence to diet and medication routines.

Let’s listen to a 26- to 30-year-old woman with UC describe what it’s like for her to live with this condition and the “mental load” of navigating a flare-remission condition.

Q1, R132

Understanding the patient voice is at the heart of 

, which we approach holistically by analyzing what is said, how it’s said, and how it sounds.

Focusing on the content and language of her response, this patient describes the “unknowingness” of living with UC using the refrain “I don’t know” to introduce how her symptoms emerge unpredictably (if cyclically). This lack of control and knowledge she feels results in additional stress that wear her down mentally like symptoms wear her down physically.

 characterized by moderately negative emotionality (‘valence’) and decreased excitement (‘activation’), which indicates frustration at and acceptance of how UC limits adds stress to her life and forces her to make accommodations.

Overall, her response underscores the challenges of living with an unpredictable condition and the unmet need for therapeutic options that help those living with UC to exert control over their lives without overly burdensome diet and lifestyle changes. 

Our Listening Platform makes it simple for patients to speak with us about their experiences in an open and authentic way and easy for you to engage with their perspectives directly.

If you’re interested in hearing from more patients like this one so that you can gain insight into their experiences, beliefs, behaviors, and desires, 

Explore the daily challenges of living with ulcerative colitis through a patient's perspective on unpredictability, stress management, and lifestyle adaptations.

In Support of Crohn's & Colitis Awareness Week (Dec. 1-7)

National Epilepsy Awareness Month (NEAM) is dedicated to raising awareness and understanding about epilepsy. This observance takes place annually in November and has been recognized since 1969 by the Epilepsy Foundation. The purpose of NEAM is to shed light on the challenges faced by the 3.4 million people and their families affected by epilepsy in the United States alone. Despite being one of the oldest known medical conditions, epilepsy continues to face significant public fear and misunderstanding, leading to discrimination, lack of funding for research, and premature deaths among people with epilepsy.

Epilepsy is a neurological disorder characterized by recurrent seizures, which can manifest in various forms and severities. The condition affects mood, sleep patterns, cognitive functions, and social interactions, creating a complex array of challenges for those living with it.

Let’s listen to a 31- to 35-year-old woman with epilepsy describe what it is like to live with the condition:

Question 1, Response 93

To start, let’s jump into what this patient says and how she says it. When describing epilepsy’s impact, she highlights the fear she feels due to epilepsy’s unpredictability – you essentially never know when a seizure will happen (“can come on at any time without warning”).

, we hear and see in the acoustics a dip in the acoustic control (‘dominance’) when she talks about the sudden nature of epilepsy, as well as negative tone (‘valence’) when speaking about the long-lasting impact of seizures (“you are just out of it for the whole day…”). This vocal quality indicates feelings of anxiety or fear, which closely aligns with the language of her response.

Considering both what is being said and how it sounds, this woman makes it clear that epilepsy impacts patients’ emotional well-being and it has effects that reach beyond the moments a seizure happens. Her response an implicit call to action for pharmaceutical companies to continue to develop more effective treatment options that alleviate these burdens.

Discover the impact of epilepsy during National Epilepsy Awareness Month. Explore patient insights, challenges, and the importance of amplifying their voices for better understanding and treatment advancements.

In Recognition of National Epilepsy Awareness Month (November)

Listening is at the heart of what we do at inVibe. Thanks to the combined efforts of our Product and Research teams, we’re able to listen to and analyze our voices responses more efficiently and more insightfully than ever. Together, the partnership between our teams helps us improve our client offerings. Recently, we’ve been able to release new features that address:

Faster access to key findings and summaries

More versatile ways to listen to and share findings

Faster Access to Key Findings & Data Summaries

To help our clients get to the heart of what matters sooner, our dashboard now has a new AI-search feature that automatically summarizes findings and identifies key insights in real time. Clients can now access high-level insights almost instantly, as well as use a chat feature to search and query the data. Importantly, our AI-search tool is not only designed to think like our analysts, but it even cites its sources like we do, making it easy for clients to track key insights and find relevant voices that speak to specific business questions.

Key Findings

The addition of AI-driven search and prompts within our dashboard has made it faster and easier to query data, verify findings, pull sample quotes, and generate new hypotheses. With advancements happening rapidly in the world of AI models, we’ve committed to ensuring the models we use are in fact the most accurate and align with our research process. Also, early on in development, we noticed challenges with AI hallucinations, lack of formatting, and missing sources that led to less-than-ideal outputs. In that spirit, our Product and Research teams routinely partner to rate and evaluate how AI models answer prompts, generate, key findings, and provide outputs of the highest quality and in the most useful format. This process helps us ensure the AI tools we use are truly the best options for us and our clients.

More Versatile Ways to Listen to and Share Findings

While AI-search and summary has helped clients find insights faster, we also wanted to ensure it helped them 

 those insights in an engaging way. With that goal in mind, our dashboard now includes a tool that transforms your research into dynamic, narrated video presentations at the click of a button. The "Make a Presentation" tool uses AI to generate a multimedia video, combining key findings from your project or data query with authentic voice clips from your research participants. By clicking through the module, you can customize every aspect - from selecting relevant participant quotes and insights to customizing the voice over script. In a matter of minutes, you'll have a professionally narrated video presentation that weaves together data insights and real participant voices, ready to download and share with stakeholders.

Make Presentation

While we’ve been busy advancing our dashboard and analytics, there is more to come – from a better way to search data from multiple projects at once to a configurable project request tool to making starting research with easier – the team is always looking to improve our customers’ experience via our internal partnerships. As Amit Ray said, “Collaboration is the essence of life. The wind, bees, and flowers work together to spread pollen.” In past roles, I’ve seen technology and research teams operate separately, even though both are essential to client success. But here, watching our Product and Research teams collaborate has shown me the power of true synergy. This environment pushes us to think in new ways, build something larger than any single project, and innovate thoughtfully. And it’s this spirit of collaboration that allows us to deliver deeper insights and lasting value to our clients.

We’d love to collaborate with you on your research needs! 

 about how the inVibe team can help you accomplish your business objectives, and even take a tour of the exciting new dashboard features allowing for better, faster research.

Discover how inVibe's Product & Research teams collaborate to deliver faster insights through AI-powered features, improved analytics, and innovative presentation tools.

Responsible AI: Validating LLM Outputs

How we ask: How inVibe writes voice response questions

In Support of Crohn's & Colitis Awareness Week (Dec. 1-7)

In Recognition of National Epilepsy Awareness Month (November)

Enhancing Insights Through Collaboration

/voice

/product

/resources

/use-cases

/company

@social